According to iAsk.ai – Ask AI:

The perception that people "don't believe in peace" is complex and multifaceted, often stemming from a combination of historical, psychological, sociological, and political factors. It's not necessarily a disbelief in the concept of peace, but rather a skepticism about its achievability or sustainability given the realities of human nature and global dynamics.

One significant reason is the prevalence of conflict throughout history. From ancient tribal skirmishes to modern geopolitical tensions, human history is replete with wars, violence, and disputes. This constant cycle of conflict can lead to a cynical view that peace is an idealistic, unattainable goal, rather than a practical reality [1]. The media's focus on conflict and crises further reinforces this perception, often overshadowing instances of successful diplomacy or peaceful coexistence.

Psychologically, human nature itself is often cited as a barrier to peace. Theories suggest that humans possess inherent tendencies towards aggression, competition, and self-interest [2]. While cooperation and empathy are also fundamental human traits, the darker aspects can be amplified by fear, insecurity, and the desire for power or resources. When these negative traits dominate, the pursuit of peace can seem naive or unrealistic. The concept of "us vs. them" mentality, where groups define themselves in opposition to others, also fuels conflict and makes genuine peace difficult to achieve [3].

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI: Sociologically, structural inequalities and injustices often undermine peace. When there are significant disparities in wealth, power, or access to resources, resentment and conflict can fester [4]. Groups who feel marginalized or oppressed may resort to violence to achieve their rights or redress grievances, making lasting peace elusive without addressing the root causes of inequality. Furthermore, the role of identity – whether national, ethnic, religious, or ideological – can be a powerful force for both unity and division. When identities are perceived as being under threat, or when one group seeks dominance over another, conflict can erupt, making compromise and peaceful resolution challenging [5].

Politically, the pursuit of national interests and geopolitical power struggles frequently overshadow efforts for peace. Nations often prioritize their own security, economic prosperity, and influence, sometimes at the expense of international cooperation or the well-being of other states [6]. The arms trade, the development of advanced weaponry, and the strategic alliances formed by nations can create an environment of distrust and competition, where peace is seen as a temporary truce rather than a permanent state. The failure of international institutions to consistently prevent or resolve conflicts also contributes to skepticism about the efficacy of peaceful approaches [7].

Finally, the definition of peace itself can be a point of contention. Is peace merely the absence of war, or does it require justice, equality, and human rights? If peace is defined broadly, its achievement becomes even more challenging, leading some to believe it's an impossible ideal. The constant presence of low-level conflicts, political instability, and social unrest, even in the absence of full-scale war, can lead to a feeling that true peace is perpetually out of reach.

It's important to note that while skepticism about peace exists, a vast majority of people still desire it and work towards it. The perceived "disbelief" often stems from a realistic assessment of the obstacles rather than a rejection of the ideal itself.