Jump to
Related Questions Videos

The Origins and Designation of the United Nations Secretary-General

The decision to title the head of the United Nations (UN) as the "Secretary-General" rather than "President" was a deliberate choice made by the organization's founders during the drafting of the UN Charter in 1945. This designation was intended to define the nature of the office as primarily administrative and diplomatic rather than sovereign or executive in a traditional governmental sense. Unlike a "President," who often wields independent executive power or represents a state's supreme authority, the Secretary-General was envisioned as the "chief administrative officer" of the Organization, a title explicitly codified in Article 97 of the UN Charter.[1] [2] The framers of the Charter, drawing heavily from the precedent of the League of Nations, sought to create a role that balanced the need for leadership with the requirement of impartiality and subservience to the member states, particularly the Great Powers.[3]

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:

Historical Precedent: The League of Nations

The choice of the title "Secretary-General" is deeply rooted in the history of international organizations, specifically the League of Nations (1919–1946). Sir Eric Drummond, the first Secretary-General of the League, established the precedent that the head of an international secretariat should be a career civil servant rather than a political leader.[4] During the Dumbarton Oaks Conference in 1944, where the blueprint for the UN was created, the Allied powers—the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China—agreed that the new organization should maintain this tradition of a "Secretariat" headed by a "Secretary-General" to ensure the office remained focused on international administration and the implementation of mandates from the Security Council and General Assembly.[5] [6]

Constitutional Distinction: Secretary vs. President

In the context of the United Nations, the title "President" is already utilized for the presiding officers of the various principal organs. For instance, the General Assembly is headed by a President (PGA), and the Security Council features a rotating Presidency.[7] If the head of the entire organization were also called "President," it would create significant constitutional confusion regarding the hierarchy of power. Furthermore, the term "President" often implies a direct mandate from a constituency or a level of political autonomy that the founding members were hesitant to grant.[8] By using "Secretary-General," the Charter emphasizes that the individual is the head of the Secretariat—the UN's civil service—rather than the head of the Member States.[9]

The "Most Impossible Job": Roles and Responsibilities

Trygve Lie, the first UN Secretary-General, famously described the position to his successor, Dag Hammarskjöld, as "the most impossible job on this earth."[10] This difficulty arises from the dual nature of the role:

  1. Chief Administrative Officer: As defined in Article 97, the Secretary-General oversees the vast UN bureaucracy, managing thousands of staff members and a multi-billion dollar budget.[1] [11]
  2. Political Advocate and Mediator: Article 99 provides a unique political power, allowing the Secretary-General to "bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security."[1] [12]

While a "President" might be expected to lead with a specific political agenda, the Secretary-General is expected to exercise "good offices"—a form of quiet diplomacy and mediation that relies on the office's perceived impartiality.[13] [14]

Selection Process and Sovereignty

The selection process further explains why the title remains "Secretary-General." The appointee is recommended by the Security Council (subject to a veto by any of the five permanent members) and appointed by the General Assembly.[15] This process ensures that the Secretary-General remains a "servant" of the member states. In international law, the UN is an intergovernmental organization, not a world government; therefore, it does not have a "President" in the sense of a head of state, as that would imply a level of supranational authority that member states are unwilling to concede.[16] [17]

Evolution of the Office

Over decades, various officeholders have expanded the influence of the title. Dag Hammarskjöld transformed the role from a mere "clerk" into a proactive "global diplomat," yet even he maintained that the authority of the office was derived from its service to the Charter rather than personal executive power.[18] Today, the Secretary-General acts as a spokesperson for the world's most vulnerable, but the title continues to reflect the foundational principle that the UN is a tool for cooperation between sovereign states, managed by a secretariat, rather than a government led by a president.[19] [20]

World's Most Authoritative Sources

  1. The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary. Edited by Bruno Simma et al., 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012. (Print)↩
  2. Kelsen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. Stevens & Sons Limited, 1950. (Print)↩
  3. Meisler, Stanley. United Nations: A History. Revised Edition, Grove Press, 2011. (Print)↩
  4. Walters, F.P. A History of the League of Nations. Oxford University Press, 1952. (Print)↩
  5. Hilderbrand, Robert C. Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security. University of North Carolina Press, 1990. (Print)↩
  6. Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. Edited by Edmund Jan Osmańczyk and Anthony Mango, Routledge, 2003. (Reference Publication)↩
  7. The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Edited by Thomas G. Weiss and Sam Daws, Oxford University Press, 2007. (Print)↩
  8. Fasulo, Linda. An Insider's Guide to the UN. 3rd ed., Yale University Press, 2015. (Print)↩
  9. Bailey, Sydney D. The Secretariat of the United Nations. Praeger, 1962. (Print)↩
  10. Lie, Trygve. In the Cause of Peace: Seven Years with the United Nations. Macmillan, 1954. (Print)↩
  11. Gordenker, Leon. The UN Secretary-General and Secretariat. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2010. (Print)↩
  12. Chesterman, Simon. Secretary or General?: The UN Secretary-General in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2007. (Print)↩
  13. Urquhart, Brian. Hammarskjöld. Alfred A. Knopf, 1972. (Print)↩
  14. United Nations. The Role of the Secretary-General↩
  15. Appointing the UN Secretary-General. Security Council Report, 2015. PDF↩
  16. Franck, Thomas M. Nation Against Nation: What Happened to the UN Dream and What the U.S. Can Do About It. Oxford University Press, 1985. (Print)↩
  17. Bardon, James. The United Nations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2007. (Print)↩
  18. Newman, Edward. The UN Secretary-General from the Cold War to the New Era. St. Martin's Press, 1998. (Print)↩
  19. Council on Foreign Relations. The Role of the UN Secretary-General↩
  20. Wikipedia contributors. Secretary-General of the United Nations↩

Would you like to explore how specific Secretaries-General, such as Dag Hammarskjöld or Kofi Annan, expanded the political powers of the office beyond its administrative origins?

Sign up for free to save this answer and access it later

Sign up →