The Trump administration authorized a $20 billion financial lifeline for Argentina in late 2025, primarily through a currency swap, with an additional $20 billion sought from private sources, to address Argentina's deepening economic crisis and support President Javier Milei's government [1] [2] [3] [4]. This move was driven by political and geopolitical considerations rather than purely economic ones [1].

According to www.iAsk.Ai - Ask AI:

The primary reasons for the Trump administration's decision to provide financial assistance to Argentina were multifaceted:

1. Political Alliance and Support for President Milei: President Trump explicitly tied the financial aid to the success of Argentine President Javier Milei's party in legislative elections, stating, "If he wins, we're staying with him, and if he doesn't win, we're gone" [1]. Milei, a self-described libertarian, is seen as a political ally of the Trump administration, and the aid aimed to help keep him in power and support his pro-market agenda [1] [3] [5]. Critics, including Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, alleged that the bailout was designed to prop up a "MAGA-aligned President" [4].

2. Geopolitical Interests and Countering China: Argentina possesses significant reserves of lithium and rare earth minerals, making it a country of strategic interest [1]. The U.S. stepped in to provide financial support as a means of confronting China's growing influence in the region and in Argentina specifically [1].

3. Addressing Argentina's Economic Crisis: Argentina has a history of economic instability, frequently facing shortages of U.S. dollars due to its partially dollarized economy [1] [3]. The country was running out of hard currency, with critically low usable foreign exchange reserves, and needed an infusion of dollars to avoid a significant devaluation of its currency, the peso, and to meet external debt payments [3]. The $20 billion currency swap was intended to stabilize the peso and provide emergency liquidity [3] [6].

4. Influence of Politically Connected Individuals: There were allegations that the bailout was influenced by a billionaire hedge fund manager, Robert Citrone, a long-time friend and former colleague of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Citrone's hedge fund had significant exposure to Argentinian debt, and critics suggested the bailout was designed to rescue his collapsing investments [4].

The financial assistance was structured as a currency swap, where the U.S. Treasury exchanged dollars for Argentine pesos, utilizing the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) [2] [3]. This fund, established during the Great Depression, allows the Treasury Department to intervene in foreign exchange markets and provide crisis lending without direct Congressional authorization [2] [3]. The move drew significant criticism from various groups, including U.S. soybean farmers who were already struggling due to Trump's trade war with China, as China had shifted its soybean purchases from the U.S. to Argentina and Brazil [1] [6]. Lawmakers also raised concerns about the use of taxpayer money for a foreign bailout while domestic programs faced funding shortfalls and a government shutdown [4] [5].