How to Measure Hips: Understanding Your Body's Natural Architecture
Fashion designers whisper about it in their ateliers, tailors mark it with chalk on fine fabrics, and yet most of us fumble with a measuring tape wondering if we're doing it right. Hip measurement sits at this curious intersection of medical necessity, fashion requirement, and personal body awareness—a simple number that somehow manages to confound even the most body-conscious among us.
I've watched countless people struggle with this seemingly straightforward task, and honestly, the confusion makes perfect sense. Unlike measuring your height (stand against a wall) or your shoe size (step on that metal contraption), hip measurement requires a peculiar dance of precision, anatomy knowledge, and sometimes a bit of contortionism if you're doing it solo.
The Anatomy Lesson Nobody Gave You
Let me paint you a picture that might surprise you: your hips aren't where you think they are. Most people instinctively measure at their hip bones—those prominent points you can feel jutting out when you put your hands on your waist. Wrong spot entirely.
The measurement we call "hips" actually captures the fullest part of your lower body, which typically sits several inches below those hip bones. This includes the curve of your buttocks, the width of your upper thighs, and yes, any love handles that might be hanging around. It's essentially the widest circumference of your lower body, usually found about 7-9 inches below your natural waistline.
This misconception leads to all sorts of fitting disasters. I once knew a woman who ordered custom-made pants based on what she thought were her hip measurements. When they arrived, she couldn't pull them past her thighs. Expensive lesson learned.
Tools of the Trade (And Why That Old Tape Measure Won't Cut It)
You'd think any measuring tape would do, but here's where things get interesting. That ancient metal tape measure in your toolbox? Leave it there. Metal tapes don't curve naturally around the body, and they have this annoying habit of kinking at crucial moments.
What you need is a flexible fabric or vinyl measuring tape—the kind seamstresses use. These typically come in 60-inch lengths, though for hip measurement, you'll rarely need more than 45 inches unless you're measuring for plus-size garments. The best ones have measurements on both sides, which saves you from the awkward twist-and-read maneuver.
Some people swear by those newfangled digital measuring tapes that display the measurement on a little screen. Personally, I find them unnecessarily complicated for something so simple, but if you struggle reading small numbers or have mobility issues, they might be worth the investment.
The Standing Position Paradox
Here's something that drives me slightly mad: every instruction manual tells you to "stand naturally," but nobody explains what that means. Natural for whom? A ballet dancer's natural stance differs wildly from a weightlifter's.
What they're really asking for is a neutral position. Feet should be together or no more than a fist-width apart. Weight distributed evenly on both feet. No sucking in, no pushing out, no weird hip tilts. Think of how you stand when you're waiting in line at the grocery store, not paying attention to your posture. That's your natural stance.
The mirror becomes your best friend here, but not for vanity's sake. You need to see if you're unconsciously tilting your pelvis forward or backward, which can add or subtract inches from your measurement. I've seen differences of up to three inches just from posture adjustments.
Finding the Sweet Spot
Now comes the treasure hunt. Starting from your waist (that's the narrowest part of your torso, usually just above your belly button), slide the tape measure down slowly. You're feeling for the widest point, which might be higher or lower than you expect.
For some body types, this widest point sits right at the top of the thigh crease. For others, it's a bit higher, encompassing the fullest part of the buttocks. There's no universal "X inches below the waist" rule because bodies are wonderfully, frustratingly unique.
A trick I learned from an old Italian tailor: take three measurements at slightly different heights and use the largest one. This accounts for any asymmetry in your body (and trust me, we're all a bit lopsided) and ensures your clothes won't be too tight at any point.
The Solo Measurement Challenge
Measuring your own hips ranks somewhere between "mildly awkward" and "circus act" on the difficulty scale. The tape wants to slip, your arms aren't quite long enough to hold everything in place, and checking if the tape is level all around requires eyes in the back of your head.
My solution? Use a full-length mirror positioned at an angle. This lets you see both front and back views without too much twisting. Thread the tape measure around your body, holding it in front where you can see the numbers. The key is keeping the tape parallel to the floor—any diagonal slant will give you a falsely large measurement.
Some people use the "string first, measure later" method. Wrap a string around your hips, mark where it meets, then measure the string on a flat surface. It works, but you lose the ability to adjust for proper positioning.
The Clothing Conundrum
Should you measure over clothes or skin? The fashion industry can't seem to agree, which adds to the confusion. Here's my take: it depends on what you're measuring for.
For medical purposes or body tracking, measure over underwear or thin, close-fitting clothes. You want consistency more than anything else. For clothing purchases, consider what you'll wear underneath. Buying jeans? Measure over underwear. Getting a formal dress that requires shapewear? Measure with the shapewear on.
Whatever you choose, stick with it. Consistency in method matters more than the method itself. I keep a little notebook with my measurements and always note what I was wearing—saved me from ordering the wrong size more than once.
When Numbers Lie
Here's a truth bomb that might ruffle some feathers: hip measurements are notoriously unreliable for determining clothing size. A 40-inch hip measurement might mean size 12 in one brand, size 14 in another, and "good luck finding anything that fits" in a third.
The fashion industry's lack of standardization borders on the absurd. I've seen size charts where the same hip measurement corresponds to sizes ranging across four different numbers. European sizes, American sizes, Asian sizes—they all play by different rules, and none of them seem particularly interested in consistency.
This is why I always recommend keeping a measurement chart for brands you buy regularly. Note not just the size you purchased, but how it actually fit. That pair of jeans that claims to be for 38-inch hips but actually fits your 40-inch hips perfectly? Write it down. Future you will thank present you.
The Professional Touch
Sometimes, you need to call in the experts. Professional measurements—whether from a tailor, a fitness assessment, or a medical exam—often yield different numbers than home measurements. This isn't necessarily because you're doing it wrong.
Professionals use consistent pressure, have practiced positioning, and most importantly, can see what they're doing from all angles. They also measure for specific purposes. A tailor measuring for a skirt might take a slightly different hip measurement than a personal trainer doing a body composition assessment.
If you're investing in expensive custom clothing or need measurements for medical reasons, spring for professional measuring. The $20-50 you spend at a tailor shop could save you hundreds in ill-fitting clothes.
Beyond the Numbers
Let me get a bit philosophical here. We've turned hip measurement into this precise science, but bodies change. They change throughout the day (hello, post-meal bloat), throughout the month (hormonal fluctuations are real), and throughout the years.
I measure myself quarterly, not because I'm obsessed with numbers, but because it helps me understand my body's patterns. My hips are consistently 1-2 inches larger during certain times of the month. They expand slightly after long flights. They shrink a bit during stressful periods when I forget to eat properly.
Understanding these patterns transformed how I shop for clothes. I no longer panic when something that fit perfectly last month feels snug. Bodies are dynamic, not static mannequins.
The Cultural Context We Ignore
Different cultures measure bodies differently, and pretending otherwise does everyone a disservice. In some Asian countries, hip measurement includes a different set of assumptions about undergarments and ease. European measurements often assume less ease than American ones.
I learned this the hard way when ordering clothes from a Japanese brand. Their size chart seemed straightforward enough, but the cultural expectation of how clothes should fit—closer to the body, less room for movement—meant their size 12 fit like an American size 8.
Making Peace with the Process
After all this, you might wonder why we bother with hip measurements at all. Why not just try everything on? In our increasingly digital shopping world, that's not always possible. More importantly, knowing your measurements gives you power—the power to push back against arbitrary sizing, to shop confidently across brands, to track your body's changes without relying on the scale.
Hip measurement is just one number in the complex equation of how clothes fit and how we inhabit our bodies. It's not the whole story, but it's a useful chapter. Master the technique, understand its limitations, and use it as a tool, not a judgment.
The next time you wrap that measuring tape around your hips, remember: you're not just taking a measurement. You're participating in an ancient human practice of understanding our bodies' dimensions, one that connects you to every person who's ever needed clothes that fit, from ancient Egyptian linen weavers to modern fashion designers. There's something oddly comforting in that continuity.
Authoritative Sources:
Aldrich, Winifred. Metric Pattern Cutting for Women's Wear. 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
Armstrong, Helen Joseph. Patternmaking for Fashion Design. 5th ed., Pearson, 2013.
Bye, Elizabeth, and Ellen McKinney. "Sizing Systems: A Historical Review." Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, 2007, pp. 227-242.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Anthropometric Reference Data for Children and Adults: United States, 2015-2018." National Health Statistics Reports, no. 122, 2021. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr122-508.pdf
Gill, Simeon. "Body Scanning and Its Influence on Garment Development." Textile Progress, vol. 47, no. 3, 2015, pp. 235-267.