iAsk Question · The Measuring Reed: Cannabis as Temple Blueprint Tool (Page # 3) Ezekiel’s six-cubit measuring reed (approx. 9–11 ft) couldn’t have been calamus: Calamus: 1–3.5 ft max Cannabis stalk: 16–20 ft, sturdy, hollow, perfect for measurement rods Why It Matters: Restores textual accuracy to Ezekiel’s vision and links to the crucifixion reed narrative.

Analysis of the Text

Here's an analysis of the provided text and a response to the question, incorporating the requested formatting and citations.

Answering the Question

The provided text excerpt argues that the "measuring reed" mentioned in Ezekiel's vision was likely cannabis, not calamus. The core argument rests on the physical characteristics of the plants: the length of the reed and its suitability for use as a measuring tool. The text contrasts the short stature of calamus with the tall, sturdy, and hollow nature of a cannabis stalk. It also highlights the implications of this interpretation, connecting it to the crucifixion narrative.

The question asks why Ezekiel's six-cubit measuring reed couldn't have been calamus. The provided text offers a direct answer based on the physical properties of the plants.

Cited Sources

The six-cubit measuring reed in Ezekiel's vision could not have been calamus because calamus has a maximum height of 1–3.5 ft, while a cannabis stalk can reach 16–20 ft, making the cannabis stalk a more suitable candidate for a measuring rod.

The Measuring Reed: Cannabis as Temple Blueprint Tool (Page # 3)

↩

Sign up for free to save this answer and access it later