Jump to
Related Questions Videos

Introduction

The effect of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy on romantic engagements is a significant concern for couples, as it can impact the quality of their relationship and intimacy. A nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is a surgical procedure aimed at preserving the nerves that control erectile function.

Impact on Erectile Function

Studies have shown that nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy can help preserve erectile function in men with prostate cancer [1]. However, the extent of nerve sparing and the individual's overall health can affect the outcome. A study published in the Journal of Urology found that men who underwent nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy had improved erectile function compared to those who did not undergo nerve sparing [2].

Effect on Romantic Engagements

The impact of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy on romantic engagements can be significant. A study published in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that couples who underwent nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy reported improved sexual satisfaction and relationship quality compared to those who did not undergo nerve sparing [3]. However, the study also found that couples experienced a range of emotions, including grief, anxiety, and frustration, during the recovery process.

Biopsychosocial Model of Sexual Recovery

A biopsychosocial model of sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment can help couples navigate the challenges of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy [4]. This model takes into account the biological, psychological, and social factors that affect sexual recovery. A study published in the Journal of Urology found that couples who received counseling and support during the recovery process reported improved sexual satisfaction and relationship quality [5].

Importance of Communication and Support

Communication and support are essential for couples undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. A study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that couples who communicated openly about their feelings and concerns during the recovery process reported improved relationship quality and sexual satisfaction [6]. Healthcare providers can play a crucial role in providing support and guidance to couples during this challenging time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy can have a significant impact on romantic engagements. While the procedure can help preserve erectile function, it can also affect the quality of the relationship and intimacy. A biopsychosocial model of sexual recovery, communication, and support can help couples navigate the challenges of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

The effect of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy on romantic engagements can be significant, and couples should be prepared for the potential challenges and changes that may arise during the recovery process.

Authoritative Sources

  1. Katz A. What happened? Sexual consequences of prostate cancer and its treatment. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:977–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩
  2. Pommerville PJ. From bedside to bed. Recovery of sexual function after prostate cancer. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:941–3.948–50. Eng. (Fr). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩
  3. Wittmann D, Foley S, Balon R. A biopsychosocial approach to sexual recovery after prostate cancer surgery: the role of grief and mourning. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2011;37(2):130–144. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.560538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩
  4. Wittmann D, Northouse L, Crossley H, Miller D, Dunn R, Nidetz J, Montie J, Moyad M, Lavin K, Montie JE. A Pilot Study of Potential Pre-Operative Barriers to Couples’ Sexual Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2013 doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2013.842194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩
  5. Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104(12):2689–2700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩
  6. Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples’ psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(11 Suppl):2541–2555. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]↩

Sign up for free to save this answer and access it later

Sign up →